Philosophy 251: Handout #16
XXXIV. For
each of the following arguments construct a derivation to prove
that the argument is valid.
xAx / Aa & Ab
x
yBxy, Bcd
Ce / Ce
x( Dx
Ex
),
z( Ez
Fz
) / Df
Ff
zGz,
x~Gx / ~Hg
x( Ix & ~Kx), Lh v Kj /
xKx
( Ik & Lh
)
- Ma, Na /
x( Nx &
Mx )
- Obbb /
yOyby
x
yPxy /
w
zPwz
xQx,
zQz
yRy / Rc
- ~
xSxx v
zTz, Sdd /
zUzzz v ( Te v
yWy )
XXXV.
For each of the following arguments construct
a derivation to prove that the argument is valid.
xRax 
xRxa,
~Rba / ~Raa
x[
yRxy
yRyx ], Raa / Rba
x( Fx
Gx
),
x( Gx
Hx
) /
x( Fx
Hx
).
x( Fx
Gx
),
x( ( Fx & Gx )
Hx ) /
x( Fx
Hx ).
x( Fx
Gx
),
x( ( Gx v Hx )
Kx ) /
x( Fx
Kx )
xFx &
xGx /
x( Fx & Gx )
x( Fx
Gx
) /
xFx 
xGx
x( ( Fx & Gx )
Hx ) /
x( Fx
Gx ) 
x( Fx
Hx )
x( Dxx v Px ),
y~Dyy,
z( Pz
Jz ) /
w( Lwg v Pw )
- /
x( ~Bx
~Ax )
[ ~
xBx
~
xAx
]
XXXVI.
For each of the following arguments construct
a derivation to prove that the argument is valid.
x
yCxy / ( Caa & Cab ) & ( Cba
& Cbb )
x( Ax
Bx),
~Bc / ~Ac
y[( Hy & Fy )
Gy ],
zFz & ~
xKxb /
x( Hx
Gx )
xCx
Ch /
xCx
Ch
x( ~Ax
Kx ),
y~Ky /
w( Aw v ~Lwf )
y[ Hy & ( Jyy & My )] /
xJxb &
xMx
z(
Gz & Az ),
y( Cy
~Gy ) /
z( Az & ~Cz )
- ~
x( ~Rx & Sxx ), Sjj / Rj
x[( ~Cxb v Hx )
Lxx ],
y~Lyy /
xCxb
xFx,
zHz / ~
y( ~Fy v ~Hy )
Back
to Syllabus