Often the client will have a valid debt or judgment to which there is no defense, but the
debtor will not pay it. How do you help your client get what is his or her just due? The course in
creditors rights discusses the rights of creditors to collect debts and the limitations on those rights.
Over the centuries, the collection of debts has become a highly contentious area of the law.
Therefore, there has developed a very elaborate and complicated system of debt collection law.
This branch of the law cuts across the areas of contracts, civil procedure, property, and
constitutional law. The course covers self-help collection of debts, the Equal Credit Opportunity
Act, the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, cognovit bonds, pre-judgment attachment, distress
for rent injunctions to prevent the destruction of property, and post-judgment remedies for the
enforcement of judgments, garnishment, etc. The course ends with a section on suretyship. This
course covers only state remedies for debtor/creditor relationships. The federal remedy is
bankruptcy, and this law is dealt with in an entirely separate course entitled Bankruptcy. The
creditors rights course is taught by a combination of lecture and Socratic method. The beginning
of each section of the course begins with a lecture to serve as an introduction to the subject
matter,
and then the students argue both sides of various cases that will be assigned; then following that,
there is a discussion among the class. There will be an examination at the end of the
course.
Casebook:
Warren & Westbrook, Law of Debtors and Creditors (2d ed. 1991)
Hornbooks:
D. Rendleman, Enforcement of Judgments in Virginia (2d ed. 1994)
W. H. Bryson, Handbook on Virginia Civil Procedure (2d ed. 1989)
G. Glenn, Rights and Remedies of Creditors (1915)
Classroom Procedure:
Each of the cases designated below will be argued by the members of the class who will argue in
alphabetical order, the first representing the original plaintiff in the first case assigned, the second
the defendant, the third the plaintiff in the next case, etc. The classroom argument is to be the
argument to the trial court (i.e., the hearing on the merits, on a motion to
dismiss, on a demurrer, etc.), and the plaintiff is the plaintiff on the original application to the
trial court. Use all valid legal arguments, but they must be based on the facts of the case in the
casebook and on any reasonable inference found in the opinion. Ignore the time and place of the
assigned case; base your arguments on current general principles of law and equity.
I. Self Help
A. Generally.
Text, Chap. I, pp. 3-49.
Handbook, pp. 1-2
Public Finance Corp. v. Davis (1976), Text, p. 17
P = creditor; D = debtor
Vogel v. W. T. Grant Co. (1974), Text, p. 22
P = debtor; D = creditor
West v. Costen (1983), Supplement
P = debtors; D = debt collector (assume Costen is the only defendant)
Crossley v. Lieberman (1989), Text, p. 32
P = debtor; D = creditor's attorney
Scott v. Jones (1992), Supplement
P = debtor; D = creditor's attorney
K.M.C. Co. v. Irving Trust Co. (1985), Text, p. 40
P = debtor; D = creditor
Stone Machinery Co. v. Kessler (1970), Text, p. 110
P = debtor/buyer; D = creditor/seller
Wallace v. Chrysler Credit Corp. (1990), Supplement
P = debtor/buyer; D = creditor's agent B. Confession of Judgment.
Handbook, pp. 2-5
C. Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors.
Text, Chap. II, G(1), pp. 175-177
II. Pre-Judgment Remedies and Abuse of Process
Text, Chap. II, B and C, pp. 96-120.
Handbook, pp. 2-5, 291-305
Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. (1969), Text, p. 97
P = debtor; D = creditor
Home Lumber Corp. v. Karim & Meador, Inc. (1976), Supplement
P = creditor; D = mortgagee
Duncan v. Peck (1988), Text, p. 114
P = debtor; D = creditor
III. Post-Judgment Remedies
Text, Chap. II, A(1, 3-7), E, G(2), pp. 51-59, 71-95, 137-157, 177-184
Handbook, pp. 533-545
Valley Nat'l Bank v. Hasper (1967), Text, p. 84
P = creditor; D = garnishee
Twyne's Case (1601), Text, p. 137
P = creditor; D = debtor and transferee
Kotob v. Hild (1991), Supplement
P = creditor; D = debtor
ACLI Gov't Securities, Inc. v. Rhoades (1987), Text, p. 140
P = creditor; D = debtor
Sharrer, Inc. v. Sandlas (1984), Text, p. 146
P = creditor; D = creditor
First Nat'l State Bank v. Kron (1983), Text, p. 178
P = creditor; D = debtor
State v. Porter Circuit Court (1981), Text, p. 181
P = creditor; D = receiverIV. Priorities
Text, Chap. II, (2), pp. 59-71
In re Estate of Robbins (1973), Text, p. 64
P = bank; D = state
Credit Bureau v. Moninger (1979), Text, p. 68
P = bank; D = credit bureau
V. Exemptions
Text, Chap. II, D, pp. 121-137
In re England (1982), Text, p. 128
P = debtor; D = creditor
In re Freedlander (1988), Supplement
P = creditors; D = debtor
Commonwealth v. Irwin (1993), Supplement
Petitioner = debtor (D); Respondent = creditor (P)
Havelock Bank v. Hog, etc., Systems (1983), Text, p. 129
P = creditor; D = debtor
Holmes v. Blazer Financial Servs. (1979), Text, p. 131
P = creditor; D = debtor
Reed v. Union Bank of Winchester (1878), Supplement
P = creditor; D = debtor
Bank of Virginia v. Lenz (1987), Supplement
P = creditor; D = debtor
VI. Suretyship
First Am. Bank v. McCarty (1992), Supplement
P = judgment debtors; D = judgment creditor (bank)
CMF Va. Land, L.P. v. Brinson (1992), Supplement
(To be read but not argued)
Cooper v. Greenberg (1950), Supplement
P = Cooper; D = Greenberg
Siegel's Super Markets v. Montgomery (1990), Supplement
P = passive tortfeasor; D = active tortfeasorVII. Mechanics Liens
J. E. Ulrich, Va. & W. Va. Mechanic's Liens (1985);
J. L. Windsor, "Perfection and Enforcement of a Mechanic's Lien in Va."
25 U. Rich. L. Rev. 291 (1991)
Cain v. Rea (1932), Supplement
P = architect; D = landowner
Bush Constr. Co. v. Patel (1992), Supplement
P = subcontractor; D = landowner
Jaynes Concrete, Inc. v. Seabrook Corp. (1992), Supplement
P = materialman; D = landowner
In re Bradwood Realty, Inc. (1964), Supplement
P = landowner; D = contractor
Rosser v. Cole (1989), Supplement
P = landowner; D = contractor
Return to the Home Page