HOUSE
REPUBLICAN RESEARCH COMMITTEE NATIONAL DEFENSE TASK FORCE: United States. 1978. The National Defense Task Force of the House
Republican Research Committee, under the Chairmanship of Robin Beard, issued a
report on civil defense in 1978. This report
asserted that the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics had the most
comprehensive civil defense network of any nation, in stark contrast to the
lack of goals for an effective system in the United States. The Task Force suggested the following
comparisons:
--- Soviet annual expenditures over the decade
1968-1978 had averaged the equivalent of $1 billion annually as compared to
approximately 10% of that amount by the United States.
--- Soviet plans envisioned protecting 95% of the
population versus as little as 40% for the United States.
--- Soviet efforts would protect their
industrial base with new factories being dispersed across the country and
separated by more than the lethal radius of a nuclear detonation. This reduced the credibility of the United
States’ doctrine of massive retaliation.
No similar industrial protection was being undertaken in the United
States.
In
the task Force’s view:
--- existing United States shelters could
shelter less than 50% of the population.
--- the public was generally unaware of the
location of shelters.
--- shelters lacked sufficient supplies of food
and water.
--- industry in the United States as a whole
lacked a contingency plan for nuclear war.
The
Task Force made specific recommendations for strategic balance by ensuring that
an aggressor could not emerge from a nuclear exchange with superiority over the
United States, including:
--- the potential for survival of the United
States in a nuclear war should at least equal the potential for survival of the
Soviet Union.
--- the citizens of the United States should
receive the necessary education to understand nuclear war and nuclear war
survival.
--- fallout and blast protection should be
required in government funded, financed, or insured construction.
--- the United States should reestablish an air
defense system if the Soviet Union produced and deployed in service additional
Backfire bombers.
The
report also called for protection for critical personnel in target areas to
sustain essential industries and government functions as long as needed in the
case of implementation of population dispersal measures.
“The Civil Defense Question,” Journal of Civil Defense, Volume XI, Number 6, December 1978, pp. 24-25.
Entry
0248