AIR RAID PRECAUTIONS ORGANIZATION: United Kingdom. World War II. Experience of German strategic bombing during World War I led to studies in the years after the war on the vulnerability of the United Kingdom to air attack. Starting in 1924 the Air Staff provided estimates to the Air Raid Precautions subcommittee of the Home Office that indicated the outcome of an attack by a hypothetical continental adversary in the first few hours of a future war. The 1924 forecast was based on a French attack, as France was the only nation with a bomber force capable of sustained attacks on London; by 1937 the forecast shifted to the Luftwaffe as the primary threat.
Table 1-1. Projected Air Attacks Against London
| Date | Hypothetical Enemy | Initial Attack | Initial Casualties | Sustained Attack | Sustained Casualties |
| 1924 | France | 450 tons of bombs in first few hours |
3,800 killed twice that number injured |
first month | 25,000 killed |
| 1937 | Germany | 600 tons a day | 30,000 casualties | 600 tons a day in the first weeks |
66,000 killed a week 134,000 injured a week |
| 1938 | Germany | a single massive strike of 3,500 tons the first day ... | 175,000 casualties | ... or 700 tons daily average for first two weeks | 245,000 casualties a week |
| 1940 | Germany | 950 tons a day | 47,500 casualties | 950 tons a day | 332,500 casualties a week |
These projections were based on extrapolations from World War I data that suggested every ton on bombs dropped resulted in 50 casualties. The underlying scenario used for the calculations was an initial assault soon after the initiation of hostilities by the entire enemy air force, followed by a sustained bombing campaign of high explosive, incendiary, and gas bombs. The outcome was a terrorized population which would rapidly loose the will to fight. There was a general assumption that defenses would be relatively ineffective and that the bomber attack would always get through to cause significant damage. In addition, there was a general appreciation that chemical warfare would be a component of any air campaign.
A variety of projections were developed based on these scenarios. Professor J. B. S. Haldane forecasted refugees being strafed as they attempt to flee, resulting in the arterial roads being blocked. As a result he suggested that the roads be reserved for buses protected by fighter aircraft. Professor Haldane's estimates were that a 500 aircraft raid would result in 20,000 casualties and that an opening raid on London would result in 100,000 deaths.
The Home Office identified a requirement for an estimated 20,000,000 square feet of seasoned lumber per month for coffins; mass burials and even mass dumping of bodies in the English Channel were also considered. The Ministry of Health identified a requirement for 2,800,000 hospital beds. In 1939 the Mental Health Emergency Committee predicted a ratio of 3 psychiatric casualties to 1 physical casualty. Insurance estimates reached 25,000 Pounds Sterling per bomb, with an estimate of 550,000,000 Pounds Sterling worth of property damage in the first 3 weeks of the war - approximately 5 percent of the total value of property nationwide.
In 1935 the Baldwin government approved a budget allocation of 100,000 Pounds Sterling to initiate air raid precautions planning, and the Air Raid Precautions Department was established in the Home Office. Initial planning identified requirements for expanded fire service capabilities, evacuation, passive protection measures for chemical and conventional bombing attacks, and the establishment of a supporting organization. The Warden Service was activated in April 1937, and by mid 1938 had over 200,000 men and women enrolled (against an estimated 400,000 Warden requirement). The December 1937 Air Raid Precautions Act assigned responsibility for introducing air raid measures at the local authority level.
During the Munich crisis, the Air Raid Precautions organization was placed on standby. This resulted in an increase in volunteers, but the long period of the Phony War resulted in a rapid drop in credibility of the service among the general public, and members were seen as draft dodgers or grown men playing at games. The German attack on France and the evacuation at Dunkirk rapidly changed perspectives.
The United Kingdom's air raid precautions
organization was based on the theory that civil defense is a war fought at the
neighborhood level. Assistance for people in a neighborhood hit by an attack
should come from their neighbors. If the damage caused by an air raid was so
large that neighborhood resources were unable to meet the needs, resources could
be brought in from other areas to operate under the control of the local
organization. At the bottom of the structure was the local Wardens' Post,
theoretically sited to provide control for an area inhabited by approximately
500 people. In a major city, such as London, this resulted in a distribution of
approximately 10 Wardens' Posts per square mile. Wardens' Posts reported to a
District, and the District to a Borough. At the Borough level, the chief
executive became the Air Raid Precautions Controller and civil government
officers filled the key civil defense staff positions. Boroughs reported to a
Group Headquarters, and the Groups to a Region.
Twelve Regional Headquarters divided the country into regions capable of
independent action in their assigned areas (see Table 1). The regional structure was adopted
based on lessons learned from the General Strike of 1926, and using the same
regions established during that event. Each Region was administered by a
Regional Commissioner, who served as the senior civil defense official for the
geographical area and was empowered to act as the chief government official if
the Region was isolated due to air raids or invasion. The senior official at
each subordinate level of organization was termed the Air Raid Precautions
Controller.
Table 1-2. Civil Defence Regions As Of March 1941
| Number | Region Name | Control Centre | Other Towns/Cities | Counties |
| 1 | Northern | Newcastle |
Berwick on Tweed Middlesborough |
Northumberland County Durham Yorkshire - North Riding |
| 2 | North Eastern | Leeds |
York Hull Sheffield |
Yorkshire - East Riding Yorkshire - West Riding |
| 3 | North Midland | Nottingham |
Lincoln Derby |
Lincolnshire Rutland Northamptonshire Leicestershire Derbyshire Nottinghamshire |
| 4 | Eastern | Cambridge |
Norwich Lowestoff Ipswich Bedford Chelmsford Southend |
Norfolk Suffolk Cambridgeshire Huntingdonshire Bedfordshire Essex Hertfordshire |
| 5 | London | London | Croydon |
Middlesex ... parts of Surrey, Kent, Essex, and Hertfordshire |
| 6 | Southern | Reading |
Oxford Southampton Portsmouth Bournemouth |
Buckinghamshire Oxfordshire Berkshire Hampshire Dorset |
| 7 | South Western | Bristol |
Penzance Plymouth Exeter Weston Super Mare Bath Avonmouth Gloucester |
Cornwall Devon Somerset Wiltshire Gloucestershire |
| 8 | Wales | Cardiff |
Swansea Denbigh Ruthin |
Anglesey Breconshire Caernarvonshire Cardiganshire Carmarthenshire Denbighshire Flintshire Glamorgan Merionethshire Monmouthshire Montgomeryshire Pembrokeshire Radnorshire |
| 9 | Midland | Birmingham |
Coventry Shrewsbury |
Herefordhsire Worcestershire Warwickshire Staffordshire Shropshire |
| 10 | North Western | Manchester |
Chester Liverpool Preston Barrow in Furness Carlisle |
Cheshire Lancashire Westmorland Cumberland ... may have included northwest corner of Derbyshire |
| 11 | Scotland | Edinburgh |
Glasgow Dumfries |
Aberdeenshire Forfarshire Argyllshire Ayrshire Banfshire Berwickshire Buteshire Caithness Clackmannshire Dumfries-shire East Lothian Fife Inverness-shire Kincardineshire Kinross-shire Kirkcudbrightshire Lanarkshire Midlothian Morayshire Nairnshire Orkney Islands Peebles-shire Perthshire Renfrewshire Ross and Cromarty Roxburghshire Selkirkshire Shetland Islands Stirlingshire Sutherland West Lothian Wigtownshire |
| 12 | South Eastern | Tunbridge Wells |
Chatham Margate Canterbury Dover Folkestone Hastings Brighton |
Kent Surrey Sussex |
In practice, the system structure responded as follows:
(1) An incident occurred that caused damage and required response.
(2) The local Air Raid Warden detected the incident and ran to his Wardens' Post
to make a report.
(3) The Wardens' Post reported the incident to the Control Center, and, if a
fire had been ignited, to the Fire Control. Telephone clerks received the
calls and passed them to the Control Center officers. Each incident was
plotted on a map with a colored pin, allowing rapid assessment of the bombing
situation. When telephone communications failed, messages were delivered
by dispatch riders, bicyclists, or runners.
(4) Fire Control dispatched fire appliances from Fire Stations to the scene.
(5) The Control Center dispatched (a) stretcher parties from the First Aid Depot
to treat minor injuries, (b) ambulances, and (c) heavy rescue teams. Each
incident report generated an initial dispatch of one first aid party and one
rescue party. As follow-up reports were received, additional parties were
dispatched from the depots by telephone.
(6) The Control Center maintained records of the resources dispatched to the
incident. Tally boards how many parties from each response service were
committed, on standby for immediate response, or were in reserve.
(7) An Incident Officer assumed command of the incident on scene; his
communications capability was provided by messengers.
(8) Firefighters suppressed structural fires, and heavy rescue personnel
accessed and freed trapped people.
(9) Initial patient care was provided by a First Aid Party, composed of four
trained first-aiders and a driver, and eventually supplemented in the later days
of the Blitz by an on-call incident doctor. Litter patients were moved
first by stretcher parties and then by ambulance, and minor injuries by automobile,
to the First Aid Post for treatment by doctors and nurses. A First Aid Post was
a fixed facility staffed by a physician, nurse, and nursing auxiliaries, and served approximately 15,000 people.
Mobile first aid posts provided a deployable capability to meet specific
incident needs, were set-up in the street near the incident location to provide
care, and could be augmented by on-call incident physicians.
If a local area suffered extensive damage, the Control Center could request
assistance. This process worked as follows:
(1) Control Center requested assistance from Regional Headquarters.
(2) Regional Headquarters contacted a Control Center in an area that had not
suffered damage.
(3) Second Control Center dispatched resources to a Reinforcement Camp located
on the periphery of the raided area.
(4) Resources were transferred at the Camp to the control of the first Control
Center and were dispatched to incidents as required.
Sources:
Ramsey, Winston G., editor, The Blitz: Then and
Now, Volume 1, London, United Kingdom, Battle of Britain Prints International,
1987.
"Air Raid Precautions 1924-1939," location http://www.fortunecity.co.uk/meltingpot/oxford/330/arp/arp1.html,
accessed 28 August 2001. Spender, Stephen, Citizens in War - And After, London,
United Kingdom, George G. Harrap & Co. Ltd., 1945. United Kingdom, British
Information Services, Front Line: The Official Story of the Civil Defense of
Britain, New York, New York, United States of America, The MacMillan Company,
1943.
Entry 0101 - updated 9 September 2003